检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘睿 LIU Rui(Law School,Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230601,China)
出 处:《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》2020年第1期25-29,共5页Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:自《刑法修正案(八)》增设食品监管渎职罪以来,其适用率呈偏低的趋势,与我国食品安全犯罪频发的现状不相符合。究其原因,该罪在责任主体认定、因果关系判定,以及危害后果界定三个方面存在难以厘清的困境。而学界虽在不断探讨该罪名的适用标准,但大多局限于理论建构层面,而忽略了司法适用的有效性。故从实证分析视角,明晰该罪的司法认定标准,以期对我国的司法实践有所贡献。Since the Criminal Law Amendment(8)added the crime of dereliction of duty in food supervision,the trend of low applicability does not accord with the current situation of frequent food safety crimes in China.The reasons are as follows,It is difficult to clarify the predicament of the crime in three aspects:the identification of the subject of responsibility,the determination of causality and the definition of harmful consequences.And the academic circles are also constantly exploring the applicable standard of this crime,but many of them are confined to the level of theoretical construction,the validity of judicial application is neglected.Therefore,this paper intends to analyze from the perspective of empirical analysis,clarifying the Judicial Recognition Criteria of the Crime,with a view to benefiting our judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.61.129