股东除名决议撤销之诉的立法障碍与对策——兼论我国强制除名之诉的确立  

Legislative Obstructions and Counter Measures of Actions for Revoking Resolution of the Expulsion of the Shareholders

作　　者：王彦明[1] 焦锦璇 WANG Yan-ming;JIAO Jin-xuan

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130012

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2020年第3期117-124,238,共9页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：《公司法解释(四)》第2条与《公司法解释(三)》第17条之间存在冲突,导致被除名股东无法提起股东除名决议撤销之诉以保护自己的合法权益。对于这一立法障碍,已有的两种解释理路都不可取;而调适公司决议撤销之诉原告股东范围的理路看似合理,实则又会引发新的难题,亦非理想之策。因此,确立强制除名之诉,对股东除名程序予以修正,乃为最优立法选择,不仅可使已有立法障碍随之破解,还能有效弥补股东除名规则立法之不足,统一司法审判标准。Because of the legislative conflict between Section 2 of the Fourth Judicial Interpretation on Company Act and the Section 17 of the Third Judicial Interpretation on Company Act,expelled shareholders cannot file a lawsuit to revoke the resolution of the expulsion of the shareholders to protect their legal rights and interests.The two existing solutions for this obstruction fail to take into account all the circumstances and therefore do not work.Although it seems reasonable to adjust the scope of the plaintiff of Section 2 of the Fourth Judicial Interpretation on Company Act,it will also lead to some new problems.In our opinion,it is the best way to establish the compulsory procedure for the court to decide the effect of the resolution of the expulsion of the shareholders.In this way,we do not only solve the existing legislative obstruction,but also improve the judicial standards and make shareholders expulsion system more scientific and reasonable.

关 键 词：股东除名决议 决议撤销之诉 强制除名之诉 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]