政治辩论中不礼貌策略的使用研究——以2016年第三场美国总统竞选辩论为例  

The Use of Impoliteness Strategies in Political Debates——A Case Study of the Third American Presidential Debate in 2016

作　　者：王若希 马群英[1] WANG Ruoxi;MA Qunying(School of Foreign Languages,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610500)

机构地区：[1]西南石油大学外国语学院,四川成都610500

出　　处：《武夷学院学报》2020年第1期52-57,共6页Journal of Wuyi University

摘　　要：总统竞选电视辩论始于1960年尼克松与肯尼迪之间的较量,学者们多以人际功能、CDA、模糊语等角度来分析政治辩论语篇。以语用学的研究视角,使用定性研究的方法,选取2016年第三场美国总统竞选对话中的不礼貌言语行为作为语料,采用Culpeper所提出的不礼貌策略作为基本框架进行分析,试图探讨竞选者在政治辩论中是如何使用不礼貌策略达到目的。经过分析,得出以下结论:竞选者使用了Culpeper所提出的不礼貌策略中的五大策略;在总统竞选辩论中,使用较多的消极不礼貌策略有助于说话者攻击对手的消极面子,从而获得更多的发言权;在总统竞选辩论中,使用回应策略来应对不礼貌策略在辩论中起到关键作用。The presidential campaign TV debate began with the contest between Nixon and Kennedy in 1960.Most scholars analyzed the political debate texts from the perspectives of interpersonal function,CD A,and ambiguity.This paper intends to use qualitative research method,selecting impolite speech acts as a corpus from the third US presidential campaign dialogue in 2016.Using the impoliteness strategies framework proposed by Culpeper,this paper trys to explore how will the candidates use impolite strategies in political cdebates to achieve their purpose.After analysis,the conclusions are drawn below:First,the candidates have used the five impoliteness strategies proposed by Culpeper;Second,in the presidential election debate,the frequent use of negative impoliteness helps the speaker attack the opponent’s negative face,thus gaining more rights for speaking;Third,the use of response strategies to deal with impoliteness strategies plays a key role in the presidential debate.

关 键 词：不礼貌策略 政治辩论 Culpeper 

分 类 号：H08[语言文字—语言学]