检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘东晖[1] 孟晗 王文阳[1] 林梅毅[1] LIU Dong-hui;MENG Han;WANG Wen-yang;LIN Mei-yi(Department of Emergency,Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Xiamen 361000,China)
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第12期111-112,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的研究重型颅脑损伤患者实施优化急诊流程的影响及效果。方法选择80例于我院急诊收治的重型颅脑损伤患者,纳入时间为2017年4月至2018年4月,其中实施优化急诊流程前患者设置为参照组,优化急诊流程后为实验组,每组均40例。对比2组患者治疗相关指标及急救效果。结果实验组急诊时长、抢救时长、住院时长以及急诊对预后效果的评估均优于参照组,与参照组比较,实验组总体费用较低,实验组重型颅脑损伤急救总存活率(92.50%)高于参照组(70.00%),二者差异明显(P<0.05)。结论对于重型颅脑损伤患者予以优化急诊流程干预,能够降低临床病死率,保障患者生命安全,应予以临床推广。Objective To study the effects of emergency procedure optimization on patients with severe craniocerebral injury.Methods 80 patients with severe craniocerebral injury were selected for emergency treatment in our hospital.The time of inclusion was from April 2017 to April 2018.Among them,the patients were set up as reference group before implementing the optimized emergency procedure,and the experimental group was optimized after the emergency procedure.40 cases.Contrasting two groups of patients treatment related index and first aid effect.Results The duration of emergency,rescue,hospital and emergency in the experimental group were better than those in the reference group.The total survival rate of severe brain injury in the experimental group(92.50%)was higher than that of the reference group(70.00%).Conclusion Optimizing emergency flow intervention for patients with severe craniocerebral injury can reduce the clinical mortality rate and ensure the patient's life safety.It should be promoted clinically.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.68.89