检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈旭辉 Chen Xuhui
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2020年第2期96-101,共6页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:疫情防控须在法治轨道中展开,而目前据《传染病防治法》直接限制人身自由的防控措施,解决了依法行政的问题,却没有达到合理行政的理想效果;究其主要原因,在于对该防控措施的行政裁量权缺乏有效控制。鉴此,出路为:在司法上确立"判断过程性审查方式"、在立法中明确"公开说理"义务、设立专门疫情审查委员会解决行政争议。Pandemic prevention and control should be carried out in the orbit of rule of law. At present, the prevention and control measures that directly restrict personal freedom according to The Law on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases have solved the problem of administration according to law, but not achieved the ideal effect of reasonable administration. The main reason lies in the lack of effective control over the administrative discretion of the prevention and control measures. Consequently, the way out is to establish "judgment process review" in judicature, clarify "the obligation of open reasoning" in legislation,and establish a special pandemic review committee to resolve administrative disputes.
关 键 词:限制人身自由 传染病防治法 合理行政 行政裁量权
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7