检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈伟[1] Chen Wei
出 处:《政治与法律》2020年第5期18-29,共12页Political Science and Law
基 金:西南政法大学“强化公共卫生法治保障”专项的研究成果和西南政法大学重点课题“司法解释中的出罪及其规范构建研究”(项目编号:2019XZZD-02)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情中的法律规范适用带来新视角与新问题,在超越可容忍的社会相当性且有刑事可罚追究必要的场合,我国刑法中妨害传染病防治罪的规范适用值得关注。该罪的对象被限定为"甲类传染病",本次新冠肺炎被列为"乙类传染病",从而该罪存在适用上的瓶颈。司法解释的渐进扩张具有唤醒妨害传染病防治罪和注重公共卫生安全法益保护的一面,但是选取的方式难以与刑事法治相契合。为了更好地实现刑法参与社会治理的功能需求,应当对妨害传染病防治罪采取"立法类型化调整、司法解释适度限制"的组合路径,使刑法规范的社会适应性与刑罚处罚的有限性相融合。The application of legal norms in the context of covid-19 epidemic brings about new perspectives and issues.In situations where it is necessary to hold the perpetrator criminally responsible for a conduct beyond the tolerance of social life,the application of the norm on the crime of obstructing the prevention and control of infectious diseases is worth attention.Because the object of this crime is limited to the Class-A infectious diseases and the COVID-19 is classified as"Class-B infectious disease",there is a problem in applying the article on this crime.The progressive expansion of the judicial interpretation has the effect of activating the legal article on the crime of obstructing the prevention and control of infectious diseases and stressing the protection of the legal interest of public health and security,but such mode is not in compliance with the criminal rule of law.Thus,in order to better realize the functional demand of the criminal law for participating in social governance,we should adopt the combined approaches of"categorized adjustment in legislation,moderate restriction in judicial interpretation"for the crime of obstructing the prevention and control of infectious diseases,and integrate the social adaptability of criminal norms with the limitation of criminal penalties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.125.111