检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张勇[1] Zhang Yong
出 处:《政治与法律》2020年第5期30-39,共10页Political Science and Law
基 金:2019年度国家社科基金项目“大数据背景下公民个人信息刑法保护体系研究”(项目编号:19BFX074)的研究成果。
摘 要:国家司法机关制定发布的妨害疫情防控刑事司法意见是一种刑法适用性解释,与规范性司法解释相比,其具有间接的法律适用效力。从刑法体系解释角度看,有关妨害疫情防控的刑法规范、司法解释与司法意见应当是相互协调的。对刑事司法意见的适用进行解释应当遵循整体性、动态性、协调性原则,并运用同类解释规则、同一解释规则、排他解释规则,对以危险方法危害公共安全罪、妨害传染病防治罪、妨害公务罪等相关罪名进行适用性解释,实现严格依法从重处罚和宽严相济。The criminal judicial opinions on obstructing the epidemic prevention and control formulated and issued by the national judicial organs are an interpretation about the application of criminal law,which has indirect effect on legal application compared with normative judicial interpretations.From the perspective of systematic interpretation of criminal law,the criminal law norms,judicial interpretations and judicial opinions on obstructing the epidemic prevention and control should be coordinated.The interpretation of the application of criminal judicial opinions should follow the principle of integrity,dynamic,coordination,and the interpretation of application of relevant crimes such as the crime of endangering public security by dangerous means,the crime of obstructing the prevention and control of infectious diseases and the crime of obstructing public service should follow the interpretation rules of similarity,identicalness and exclusion,so as to impose heavier punishment and realize the tempered justice with mercy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30