检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段哲哲 周义程[2] Duan Zhezhe;Zhou Yicheng(Institute of Urban,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen Guangdong 518128;School of Politics&Public Administration,Soochow University,Suzhou Jiangsu 215123)
机构地区:[1]深圳大学城市治理研究院,广东深圳518128 [2]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院,江苏苏州215123
出 处:《甘肃行政学院学报》2020年第1期13-24,M0003,共13页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基 金:党的十九届四中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“新时代完善干部担当作为的激励机制研究”(20ZDA024);广东省教育科学“十三五”规划2019年度研究专项“党的组织法规制度优化路径研究:以基层选贤任能体制为例”(2019GXJK040)。
摘 要:"凡进必考"制度是我国选贤任能制度的重要内容,有利于我国干部队伍专业化建设,但现有研究对考试录用制度与专业自主性关系的解释存在不足。本研究提出了理论上的解释:"凡进必考"制度触发基层公务员与内部人利益分离机制;注重专业能力的"凡进必考"制度触发专业角色期待机制,两者均有利于专业自主性提升。本研究采集我国东中部10个城市基层公务员数据,使用断点回归与中介效应方法,实证结果显示:《国家公务员暂行条例》1996年在地方落实后触发利益分离机制;基层公务员专业能力对公务员制度变迁与专业自主性关系起到中介作用;2014年实施《党政领导干部选拔任用工作条例》开始限缩"公开选拔"适用范围对专业自主性产生负面影响。未来选贤任能制度完善中,如何平衡灵活录用与专业自主性是一个有待解决的问题。The "fanjinbikao"system is an important content of the system of the meritocracy in China,which is conducive to the professional construction of China’s cadre team. However,the existing research has not explained the relationship between the examination employment system and professional autonomy. This study proposes a theoretical explanation :the "fanjinbikao"system triggers the mechanism of separating the interests of grassroots civil servants and insiders;the "fanjinbikao"system that focuses on professional competence triggers professional role expectation mechanisms,both of which are conducive to the improvement of professional autonomy. This research collects data on grass-roots civil servants in 10 cities in eastern and central China,using breakpoint regression and mediation effects methods. The empirical results show that the "zanxingtiaoli"triggered the benefit separation mechanism after local implementation in 1996;the professional capabilities of grassroots civil servants have affected the changes in the civil service system and the professional autonomy relationship acts as an intermediary;the implementation of the "xuanbatiaoli"in 2014 began to limit the scope of "public selection"to negative effects on professional autonomy. How to balance the flexible employment and professional autonomy is a problem to be solved in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7