护理质量控制在临床血液标本检验中的作用分析  

Analysis of the role of nursing quality control in clinical blood sample examination

作　　者：李艳辉 颜运英 周莲清[1] Li Yanhui;Yan Yunying;Zhou Lianqing(Physical Examination Center,Hunan Cancer Hospital,Changsha 410013,Hunan,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南省肿瘤医院体检中心,湖南长沙410013

出　　处：《实用检验医师杂志》2020年第1期13-15,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Pathologist

摘　　要：目的分析护理质量控制(质控)在临床血液标本检验中的作用。方法选择2018年7月-2019年7月湖南省肿瘤医院收治的住院患者312例,应用随机数字表法分为常规检验组和护理质控组,每组各156例。常规检验组进行常规临床血液标本检验,护理质控组在检验过程中进行护理质控。比较两组的标本合格率、标本错误率、医疗纠纷事件发生率以及患者的满意程度。结果护理质控组标本合格率〔98.7%(154/156)比86.5%(135/156)〕和患者满意程度〔98.7%(154/156)比85.3%(133/156)〕均明显高于常规检验组;标本错误率〔0.6%(1/156)比7.7%(12/156)〕和医疗纠纷事件发生率〔1.9%(31/156)比9.6%(15/156)〕均明显低于常规检验组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论护理质控在临床血液标本检验中的效果值得肯定,可在临床推广应用。Objective To analyze the role of nursing quality control in clinical blood sample examination.Methods A total of 312 inpatients in Hunan Cancer Hospital from July 2018 to July 2019 were divided into routine test group and nursing quality control group by random number table method.The routine test group received routine clinical blood sample test,and nursing quality control group conducted nursing quality control during test.The qualified rate,error rate,occurrence of medical disputes and satisfaction degree were compared between the two groups.Results The qualified rate [98.7% (154/156) vs.86.5% (135/156)] and the satisfaction degree [98.7% (154/156) vs.85.3% (133/156)] of the nursing quality control group were significantly higher than those of routine test group;the error rate of samples [0.6% (1/156) vs.7.7% (12/156)] and the incidence of medical disputes [1.9% (31/156) vs.9.6% (15/156)] in nursing quality control group were significantly lower than those in routine test group,with significant difference (all P < 0.05).Conclusion The results of nursing quality control in clinical blood sample examination are worthy of affirmation and can be applied in clinical practice.

关 键 词：临床 血液标本 检验 护理质量控制 作用 分析 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]