1934年《益世报》停邮事件考察  

A Study on the Mail Prohibition of Social Welfare Tientsin Reports in 1934

作　　者：吴麟[1,2] Wu Lin

机构地区：[1]中国劳动关系学院文化传播学院 [2]中国劳动关系学院文化传播学院新闻传播学系

出　　处：《新闻与传播研究》2020年第4期108-125,128,共19页Journalism & Communication

基　　金：中国劳动关系学院科研项目“民国时期的国家与媒体关系研究”(项目编号:17YY022)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1934年,学者钱端升出任天津《益世报》社论主笔,其间积极批判国民党政府对日妥协的外交政策,该报因而遭遇“停邮”处分。回顾这一事件的全过程,诸种关系缠绕交错,当局制裁举措引而缓发;派系政治隐现其间,报刊言论空间随之起伏。从中,我们可以窥见其时党国政权与民营报刊关系的动态与复杂:在“结构性紧张”的基调下,因行动者在权力网络中的具体位置而有着微妙分际。此个案显示出“关系取向”是“训政”时期南京国民政府新闻统制政策“实践逻辑”的一个重要特征。Qian Duansheng,a famous legal scholar and editorial writer of the Social Welfare Tientsin Reports since 1934,published radical criticism against Nanjing National Government's diplomatic concession to Japan.As a sanction,Social Welfare Tientsin Reports was prohibited from mailing.Reviewing the complete story of the incident,it is found that there were complex relations intertwined which led to the sanctions being launched early but implemented late.The factional politics hidden in the incident determined the space of press freedom.Through the incident,we can get a glimpse of the dynamic and complex character of the relationship between Nanking National Government and private newspapers.Despite the context of structural tensions,subtle differences existed because of the actors'specific positions in the power network.This case study indicates that relational orientation is an important feature of the practical logic of Nanking National Government's press control policy in the Political Tutelage years between 1927-1937.

关 键 词：民营报刊 《益世报》 南京国民政府 新闻统制 

分 类 号：G219.29[文化科学—新闻学]