检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗红 李小寒[3] 李玉玲[2] 吕巍[4] 于双成[2] LUO Hong;LI Xiaohan;LI Yuling;LYU Wei;YU Shuangcheng(Medical College of Hubei University of Arts and Science,Xiangyang,Hubei,441053,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北文理学院医学院,湖北省襄阳市441053 [2]吉林大学公共卫生学院 [3]中国医科大学护理学院 [4]吉林大学第一医院干部病房
出 处:《中国护理管理》2020年第3期423-427,共5页Chinese Nursing Management
摘 要:目的 :旨在研制出一套适合我国国情并体现护理专业学科特征,同时具有较高信度、效度的护理信息能力量表。方法 :综合利用定性与定量相结合的方法,构建护理信息能力评价指标体系,形成护理信息能力量表的雏形;利用多种统计方法对量表进行信度、效度检验。结果 :构建了包含5个维度32个条目的护理信息能力量表,总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.947;探索性因子分析结果显示编制的量表具有较好的结构效度;内容效度CVI指数为0.957,验证性因子分析结果证明模型拟合较好(χ2/df=0.293、AGFI=0.82、RMSEA=0.06、RMR=0.04、CFI=0.91)。结论 :研制的护理信息能力量表具有较好的信度及效度,为临床护理人员护理信息能力的测评提供了客观、科学的评价工具。Objective: To develop Nursing Informatics Competency Scale with good reliability and validity which not only reflects the characteristics of nursing discipline but also can be used under Chinese cultural context. Methods: The mixed method was used to construct the evaluation index system of nursing informatics competency, subsequently the prototype of Nursing Informatics Competency Scale was formed. Different statistical methods were used to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: The Nursing Informatics Competency Scale consisted of 5 dimensions and 32 items. The Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.947;the exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale had good construct validity. The Content Validity Index(CVI) was 0.957;the confirmatory factor analysis showed an adequate model fit(χ2/df=0.293, AGFI=0.82, RMSEA=0.06, RMR=0.04, CFI=0.91). Conclusion: The Nursing Informatics Competency Scale had good reliability and validity which could provide an objective, scientific and reliable evaluation tool for assessing the competency of nursing informatics for nurses in hospitals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.136.226