检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雪平[1] WANG Xue-ping(School of Accounting,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Hubei Wuhan 430073,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学会计学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《贵州财经大学学报》2020年第3期49-60,共12页Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:以2011~2018年中国A股上市公司为样本,以税务稽查系统改革"金税工程三期"为准自然实验,探讨税收执法的公司治理效应,采用双重差分模型,实证检验了金税工程三期改革对企业财务报告质量的影响。研究发现:金税工程三期改革显著提升了企业财务报告质量。金税工程三期改革的公司治理效应在治理环境较弱、信息透明度更低、融资需求更高的公司表现得更为显著。从作用机制来看,金税工程三期改革显著增强了税收执法力度,减少了企业的避税行为。Based on the sample of China’s A-share listed companies from the 2011 to 2018 period, this paper takes tax-check system reform "The third stage of Golden tax" as quasi-natural experiment, discusses the corporate governance effect of tax enforcement, and uses difference-in-difference model to empirically test the effect of the third stage of Golden tax reform on financial reporting quality. It arrives at the conclusions as follows: First, the third stage of Golden tax reform significantly improved firms’ financial reporting quality. Second, the corporate governance effect of the third stage of Golden tax reform is more pronounced in companies with weaker governance, lower information transparency and higher financing demand. Third, from the perspective of the mechanism, the third stage of Golden tax reform significantly enhanced tax enforcement and reduced corporate tax avoidance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49