检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢护锋 张绮婧 Lu Hufeng;Zhang Qijing
机构地区:[1]广州大学法学院
出 处:《法治社会》2020年第3期110-117,共8页Law-Based Society
摘 要:专利权的行政执法保护制度是一项极具中国特色的制度,在实践中对专利权保护发挥了积极作用。由于制度建设的原因,专利权行政执法制度存在执法权限和界限不清、行政处理与司法处理衔接不畅以及行政责任设置不合理等问题。对此,应当将专利纠纷行政调解排除在行政执法范围外、确立行政执法机关对专利权效力的判定权、规范专利侵权行政责任设置作为未来制度修正的重要内容;将案件的移送标准、侵权物品案值的确定作为行政处理与司法处理衔接的实体内容,同时完善证据收集与转化的程序。The administrative law enforcement protection system for patent rights is a system with Chinese characteristics and has played an active role in protecting patent rights in practice. Due to the system construction, the administrative enforcement system of the patent right has problems such as unclear enforcement authority and boundaries, poor connection between administrative processing and judicial processing and irrational setting of administrative responsibilities. In this regard, the administrative mediation of patent disputes should be excluded from the scope of administrative law enforcement, establish the power of administrative law enforcement agencies to determine the effectiveness of patent rights, and standardize the establishment of administrative liability for patent infringement as important elements of future system amendments. The establishment of the case value of an article serves as the substance of the connection between administrative and judicial processing, and at the same time improves the procedures for evidence collection and transformation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.122.164