检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:储溢泉 仓勇涛[2] 储一昀[3] Chu Yiquan;Cang Yongtao;Chu Yiyun(Postdoctoral Programme of Bank of Communications Co,Ltd,Shanghai 200336,China;School of Economics and Finance,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 200083,China;School of Accountancy,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)
机构地区:[1]交通银行博士后科研工作站,上海200336 [2]上海外国语大学国际金融贸易学院,上海200083 [3]上海财经大学会计学院,上海200433
出 处:《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第2期81-95,137,共16页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基 金:上海市2019年度“超级博士后”资助计划:教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(17YJA79005);财政部2017年度会计名家培养工程。
摘 要:自从Jensen和Meckling(1976)指出股权激励能缓解股东和管理层之间的代理问题以来,已有很多研究为股权激励的内部治理效应提供了经验证据,但股权激励是否具有外部治理效应,却鲜有研究。基于此,文章研究股权激励能否吸引更多的市场关注,以及外部的市场关注能否激励管理层实现市场预期,从而为股权激励是否具有外部治理效应提供一定的经验证据。基于沪深两市A股上市公司数据的研究发现,与未实施股权激励的公司相比,实施股权激励的公司会吸引更多的市场关注,并且公司实际业绩与市场预期的差距更小;在没有达到市场预期的情形下,与没有实施股权激励的公司相比,实施股权激励公司达不到市场预期的程度更小;股权激励的外部治理作用主要发生在两职分离公司和民营公司,当市场关注度更高时,股权激励在提升公司业绩方面更有效。该结论为股权激励的有效性争论提供了新思路,也为监管部门完善股权激励政策提供了一定的理论基础。Ever since Jensen and Meckling pointed out that equity incentives can improve agency cost between shareholders and the management,many studies had provided empirical evidence for the internal governance effects of equity incentives. However,there are few studies on whether equity incentives have external governance effects. Based on this,this paper studies whether equity incentives can attract more market attention and whether external market attention can motivate the management to achieve market expectations. This will provide some empirical evidence for whether equity incentives have external governance effects.Equity incentives generally set exercise conditions for stock options or unlocking conditions for restricted stocks,and these conditions are based on certain performance targets. Generally,these performance evaluation targets are higher than before. Therefore,the implementation of equity incentives can signal to the capital market that the management will work harder to improve company performance. When this signal is passed to the capital market,it is bound to cause more market attention,and the market will set a goal for the management’s efforts.Whether the management achieves market expectations directly affects the management’s wealth.This is because if the management fails to meet the target set by the market,the company’s stock price will fall,and the management’s personal wealth will also decrease. On the other hand,the expected target set by the market can also be regarded as the market’s estimation of the level of the management effort. If the performance of the company announcement is lower than this estimate,it is easy for the market to believe that the management has not done its best to have lazy moral hazard suspects,which will stimulate the market to vote with their feet. and the gap between the company’s actual performance and market expectations is smaller. In the case of failure to meet market expectations,compared with companies that do not implement equity incentives,comp
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222