论暂缓起诉对民营企业犯罪的适用  

The Application of Postponement of Prosecution to Crimes Committed by Private Enterprises

作　　者：蔡雨清 Cai Yuqing(School of Law,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510030,China)

机构地区：[1]广州大学法学院,广东广州510030

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2020年第2期122-129,共8页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：在优化营商环境的语境下,对民营企业提起诉讼虽彰显司法公正,但伴随的负面影响不可忽视。暂缓起诉制度的经济价值和社会价值则可对上述问题做出回应,即对犯罪的民营企业适用暂缓起诉能够保证民营企业正常生产经营,使其回归社会;同时,能够充分发挥教育、引导作用,引导民营企业合规发展。从现有的法律和刑事政策框架内将暂缓起诉制度从自然人犯罪向民营企业犯罪延伸有其现实必要性,因为我国缺乏针对企业的暂缓起诉实践,而通过对域外暂缓起诉的两种主要模式进行考察,即法院审查模式和检察官自由裁量权模式,将其合理部分进行“本土化”改造,使适用于民营企业犯罪的暂缓起诉制度成为优化营商环境的有效措施。In the context of optimizing the business environment,although litigation against private enterprises demonstrates judicial justice,the accompanying negative effects cannot be ignored.The economic and social value of the deferred prosecution system responds to the above issues.That is,the application of deferred prosecution to criminal private enterprises can ensure the normal production and operation of private enterprises and return them to society;at the same time,they can fully play the role of education and guidance to guide private enterprise compliance development.It is of practical necessity to extend the deferred prosecution system from natural person crimes to private enterprise crimes within the framework of existing laws and criminal policies,because China lacks the practice of deferred prosecution against enterprises,and the two main modes of deferred prosecution outside the domain are the investigation,that is,the court review model and the prosecutor s discretionary model,transforms its reasonable parts into“localization”,so that the suspended prosecution system applicable to crimes of private enterprises has become an effective measure to optimize the business environment.

关 键 词：民营企业犯罪 暂缓起诉制度 企业合规 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]