我國台灣地區認罪協商制度的現狀與借鑒  

Current Situation and Experience ofthe Plea-bargaining System in Taiwan

作　　者：郭爍 任禹行 Guo Shuo;Ren Yuxing(School,Beijing Jiaotong University)

机构地区：[1]北京交通大學法學院

出　　处：《中国法律（中英文版）》2019年第6期69-71,160-162,共6页China Law

摘　　要：上世紀末,我國台灣地區刑事訴訟領域掀起改革風潮,逐步淡化深受德日影響的職權主義傅统,開始吸取英美當事人主義精髓,朝著「改良式當事人進行主義」方向發展。2004年4月,在「明案速密、疑案慎斷」原則指導下,我國台灣地區借鑒美國辯訴交易制度,增訂「刑事訴訟法」第七编之一協商程序(主要包括第455條之2至第455條之11),正式確立了認罪協商制度。在此後十餘年的司法實踐中,台灣地區認罪協商制度雖飽受爭議却又在程序正當性、訴權保障等問題上形成了獨特的經驗,值得大陸地區總結與借鑒。At the end of the last century,Taiwan set off a wave of reforms in the field of criminal lawsuit,which gradually downplayed the tradition of inquisitorial system deeply influenced by Germany and Japan,started to absorb the essence of British and American adversary system,and developed in the direction of"improved adversary system".In April 2004,under the guidance of the principle of“make quick judgment in clearcut cases and careful judgment in doubtful cases”and by learning from the US system of plea-bargaining,Taiwan added the procedure of plea-bargaining to Part 7-1 of its Code of Criminal Procedure(mainly including Article 455-2 to Article 455-11),and formally established the plea-bargaining system.In the following judicial practice for over a decade,although controversial,Taiwan's plea-bargaining system has accumulated unique experience on such issues as procedural legitimacy and protection of right of action,which is worth learning from for the China's Mainland.

关 键 词：疑案 刑事 司法 制度 程序 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]