检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:倪震 Ni Zhen
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院
出 处:《学术前沿》2020年第7期92-95,共4页Frontiers
基 金:司法部2015年度国家法治与法学理论研究课题“量刑规范化视野下的刑事个案公正研究”阶段性研究成果,项目编号:15SFB2015。
摘 要:人工智能时代已悄然而至,对我国量刑改革产生了巨大影响。量刑科技化头顶大数据“光环”,身披人工智能“外衣”,在持续僭越法官自由裁量权并消解司法固有属性的同时,呈现出泛化特征。现阶段,必须清醒地认识到,量刑改革中人工智能只能扮演法官的辅助角色,切不可本末倒置。未来司法人工智能的发展,应在厘清其自身定位的基础上,寻求技术上的实质突破。The era of Al has come quietly which has had a great impact on the sentencing reform in China.In the name of big data and under the disguise of Al,the scientific and technological orientation of sentencing has continuously overstepped the discretionary power of the judges and dispelled the inherent attributes of justice,showing the characteristics of generalization.At this stage,we must realize clearly that in the sentencing reform,Al can only play the role as the assistant to the judges,and not the other way around.To develop judicial Al in the future,we should seek for a substantial breakthrough in technology on the basis of clarifying its own position.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7