检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝玥[1] Hao Yue
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学人文学院
出 处:《学术前沿》2020年第7期96-99,共4页Frontiers
摘 要:微信公众平台自上线以来,因其小众传播、便利性等特点,受到微信用户的青睐,从而得以迅速发展,但剽窃等一系列侵权问题也开始显露出来。由于《中华人民共和国著作权法》等法律法规对于剽窃的界定并不明晰,加上微信公众平台的特殊性,使得对于剽窃的认定格外困难。考虑到剽窃的本质是不当署名,因此微信用户的剽窃侵权需满足剽窃者主观上有过错、剽窃对象享有著作权等四个要件。对于微信用户和微信运营商的剽窃侵权法律责任,则根据具体情形分别适用不同的责任承担方式。Since the WeChat public platform went online,it has been popular with the WeChat users due to its small-scale communication and convenienee,so it has developed rapidly But a series of infringement problems such as plagiarism have begun to emerge.Due to the unclear definition of plagiarism in the copyright law and the particularity of the WeChat public platforms,it is extremely difficult to identify plagiarism.Con sidering that plagiarism is essentially improper signature,plagiarism by WeChat users can be constituted when the following conditions are met that the plagiarist is intentional and the infringed has tlie copyright.For the liability of the WeChat users and operators due to plagiarism,different liability methods should be applied according to the specific circumstances.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118