检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卜风贤 王璋 WANG Liling;SHU Yueyu(School of Psychology,Northwest Normal University&Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health of Gansu Province,Lanzhou,Gansu,730070)
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学西北历史环境与经济社会发展研究院,陕西西安710119
出 处:《自然辩证法通讯》2020年第4期74-78,共5页Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基 金:国家社科基金项目“历史灾害书写及其文献体系研究”(项目编号:18BZS154);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“西北地区灾害环境与城乡发展的历史研究”(项目编号:16JJD770029)
摘 要:从过去几十年的研究进展看,灾害史学科归属问题向不为人所注目讨论,在经历了多年模糊不清的学科定位以后,灾害史研究面临诸多制约因素并在领域拓展、学科建设等方面产生一系列影响作用。基于灾害史研究的内史性质,论述了灾害史研究与科学技术史学科之间的逻辑关系,根据科技史学科体系分类办法,将灾害史研究归并于科技史三分法体系下的应用科技史序列,与历史学领域的灾害史研究并行不悖。The ambiguous disciplinary status of disaster history has not received much academic notice or discussion over the past few decades. Disaster history research is faced with many restricting factors, yet it has considerable influence in terms of field development and discipline construction. Taking the internal history nature of disaster history research into consideration, this paper discusses the logical relationship between disaster history research and the discipline of the history of science and technology. It proposes that disaster history study should be assigned to the disciplinary category of the history of applied science and technology according to the threefold system of the history of science and technology. This would be provide a compatible and complementary disciplinary partner with disaster history research in the field of history.
关 键 词:灾害史研究 历史学 科学技术史 应用科技史 学科归属
分 类 号:N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28