检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史晓芸 SHI Xiao-yun(Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学,天津300387
出 处:《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》2020年第2期79-82,共4页Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College
摘 要:为调适作为“证据之王”的鉴定意见本身所存在的合理怀疑,提高证据的可采程度,专家证人参加庭审势在必行。本文以域外眼光探求专家证人制度的理论及运行实践,结合专家证人在刑事实践中的诉讼地位、权利义务、证据采信等方面存在的困境,汲取西方有益经验,从细化预审程序、赋予其相关的权利和义务、制定专家证人意见的采信标准等方面推进我国专家证人制度完善举措,以期为我国专家证人制度的完善提供改革路径。In order to adjust the"king of evidence"expert opinion itself exists reasonable doubt,improve the admissibility of evidence,expert witnesses to attend the trial is imperative.Based on outside perspective to explore the theory of the expert witness system and operation practice,the combination of expert witness in the practice of criminal litigation status,rights and obligations,the admissibility of evidence,as well as the plight of absorbing western useful experience,from the elaboration pre-trial procedures,endowed with the rights and obligations of the relevant,inter alia,to formulate the opinions of the expert witness standard aspects promote perfecting measures,expert witness system in China in order to provide the improvement of the system of expert witness reform path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49