检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Zhao Wenbing 赵文冰(Peking University Law School)
机构地区:[1]Peking University Law School
出 处:《China Legal Science》2020年第2期136-158,共23页中国法学(英文版)
摘 要:The hostile takeover wave that emerged in 2015 had vividly unveiled a significant loophole in China’s ownership disclosure regime and provided us with an opportunity to examine the existing ownership disclosure rule in China.The publication of article 71 of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China(Draft for the Third Deliberation)in 2019 further spurred the debate on the ownership disclosure rule.Tracing the history of hostile takeover both in China and the US,this paper believes that an appropriate ownership disclosure rule must strike a balance between the regulatory objectives of market transparency and market efficiency.The beneficial effect of article 71 of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China(Draft for the Third Deliberation)is that it better serves the market transparency objective due to the enhanced punishment for the violator.However,the over-drastic slow walk rule embraced in article 71 of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China(Draft for the Third Deliberation)may hamper the efficiency of the securities market.And this paper will propose a recommended amendment that will be beneficial to investors,issuers and the market as a whole.
关 键 词:TRANSPARENCY market REPUBLIC
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249