检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵方铃 ZHAO Fang-ling(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow university,Suzhou,215000,China)
出 处:《山西青年职业学院学报》2020年第1期49-53,83,共6页Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College
摘 要:在《政府信息公开条例》新修订的背景下,政府信息公开案件的事实情况值得研究。司法实践中有不少信息公开案件的行政判决涉及到宪法。实证研究发现,自2005年起,全国法院开始陆续审理政府信息公开案件,但众多法院在审理涉及政府信息公开案件时均存在裁判文书说理欠充分、宪法规范引用欠缺等问题,其根源在于学界对理论问题的讨论欠缺、裁判文书说理规范制度缺位和我国宪法实施制度的不成熟。为解决这些问题,可以采用"依宪释法"的方式进行宪法适用,同时完善裁判文书说理制度,提高法官的文书写作水平,在实践中合理适用宪法规范。Under the background of the new revision of the Regulations on the Openness of Government Information,the factual situation of government information disclosure cases is worthy of study.In the judicial practice,there are many administrative decisions in information disclosure cases involving the Constitution.Empirical studies have found that since 2005,national courts have begun to review government information disclosure cases.However,many courts have problems in the judgment of government information disclosure cases,such as inadequate judgments and lack of constitutional norms.Its roots lie in the lack of discussion on relevant theoretical issues in the academic circles,the absence of refereeing documents and the standardization system,and the immaturity and imperfection of China’s constitutional implementation system.In order to solve these problems,the constitutional application can be adopted in the form of "constitutional interpretation".At the same time,the system of judging documents and judgments should be strengthened,the level of judges’ writing should be improved,and constitutional norms should be reasonably applied in practice.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222