检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张志东 陈爱华[1] 吴杨平[1] 张雨[1] 陈素华 曹奕[1] 田镇 张帅中 李秋洁 ZHANG Zhidong;CHEN Aihua;WU Yangping;ZHANG Yu;CHEN Suhua;CAO Yi;TIAN Zhen;ZHANG Shuaizhong;LI Qiujie(Jiangsu Institute of Marine Fisheries, Nantong 226007,China;College of Fisheries and Life, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省海洋水产研究所,江苏南通226007 [2]上海海洋大学水产与生命学院,上海201306 [3]中国海洋大学食品科学与工程学院,山东青岛266003
出 处:《水产科学》2020年第3期431-437,共7页Fisheries Science
基 金:江苏省渔业科技类重大项目(D2018-1);江苏省科技厅苏北专项(SZ-YC2018064);江苏省农业农村厅水产良种保种及更新项目(2019-SJ-006);南通市基础科学研究项目(JC2018026).
摘 要:为比较文蛤红壳色选育系与江苏野生群体在不同条件下滤水率的差异并找出文蛤最佳滤水率条件,采用了试验生态学方法和响应面法对文蛤红壳色选育系幼贝进行滤水率的研究。试验结果显示,在一定范围内,文蛤幼贝滤水率随盐度、温度和藻类密度的增加而增大,超过一定范围,幼贝滤水率随盐度、温度和藻类密度的增加而减小;在同等条件下,文蛤红壳色选育系幼贝与野生群体滤水率无显著差异,但文蛤红壳色选育系生长速率显著高于野生群体;通过响应面法优化,文蛤红壳色选育系幼贝的最佳滤水率条件为:盐度21.82、温度27.40℃、藻类密度9.96×10^4个/mL,此条件下滤水率的预测值为1.62 mL/(个·min)。In order to compare the filtration rate between the selected line of red shell colored hard clam Meretrix meretrix and wild hard clam and optimize the culture condition of juvenile mollusk,we analyze the filtration rate of juvenile mollusk by the experiment ecology method and response surface method.The results showed that with the increase of salinity,temperature and the concentration of algae,the filtration rate of juvenile mollusk was increased first and then decreased.Under the same conditions,there was no significant difference in the filtration rate between the selected line of red shell colored clam and the natural clam,but the growth rate of the selected line of red shell colored clams was significantly faster than that of the wild hard clam.Through the response surface method optimization,the best filtering rate was observed in the clam cultured under the conditions of salinity of 21.82,temperature of 27.40℃,and the concentration of algae of 9.96×10^4 ind/mL.The filtering rate of the predictive value was 1.62 mL/(ind·min)under this condition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.7.73