基于科学交流过程的学术论文影响力评价研究——以中国社会科学国际学术论文为例  

Evaluation of Academic Papers Impact Based on Scientific Communication Path:A Case Study of Chinese International Academic Papers in Social Sciences

作　　者：郭凤娇[1] 赵蓉英[2] 孙劭敏 Guo Fengjiao;Zhao Rongying;Sun Shaomin(Science and Technology Information Research Institute,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255049;School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072)

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学科技信息研究所,淄博255049 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《情报学报》2020年第4期357-366,共10页Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“单篇学术论文创新性测度及影响因素研究”(19CTQ026)。

摘　　要：基于学术论文的科学交流过程,本文将学术论文影响力划分为原生影响力、线下影响力、Web 1.0影响力和Web 2.0影响力,并讨论了各类型影响力的产生过程。在此基础上,构建出学术论文影响力评价模型,并对中国社会科学国际学术论文的两组数据(包含1个对照组)进行实证研究。研究发现:(1)学术论文影响力得分与来源期刊相对影响因子及被引频次相关度最高;(2)中国研究机构学者同时作为第一作者和通信作者的学术论文(数据组1)影响力得分在整体水平上与对照组相比还有差距,且两组数据的学术论文影响力得分趋势线都呈右偏态势;(3)学术论文影响力总得分最高的50个研究机构的影响力得分按指数趋势递减,高校是中国社会科学国际研究的中坚力量;(4)在两个数据组共同覆盖的79个学科领域中,数据组1只在24个学科的平均得分大于对照组,并对学术论文覆盖的学科领域按影响力相对大小进行了分类。Based on the scientific communication path of academic papers, the academic papers impact is divided into native impact, offline impact, Web 1.0 impact, and Web 2.0 impact, and the generation processes of various types of impact are discussed. An evaluation model of the academic papers impact is constructed, and two sets of data(including a control group) obtained from the Chinese international academic papers in social sciences are empirically studied. This study has obtained the following research results andfirstly, the score of the academic papers impact demonstrates the highest correlation with relative impact factor and citation frequency. Secondly, the impact score of data group 1 is still lower than that of the overall control group, and the trend line of the academic papers impact score in both groups shows a right-leaning trend. Thirdly, the impact score of the 50 research institutes with the highest total score of academic papers decreases exponentially, and universities are the backbone of international social science research in China. Lastly, among the 79 subjects covered by the two data groups, the average score of data group 1 with 24 subjects is higher than that of the control group,and the subjects covered by academic papers are classified according to their relative influence.

关 键 词：科学交流 学术论文 影响力评价 社会科学 

分 类 号：G322[文化科学]