检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李红[1] Li Hong(School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
机构地区:[1]上海大学管理学院,上海200444
出 处:《科研管理》2020年第4期263-269,共7页Science Research Management
摘 要:发展中国家知识产权保护强度的增加对其创新能力的影响效应,引起了广泛的研究兴趣与争议。本文以三个理论为起点回顾了国内外关于发展中国家知识产权保护与创新关系的研究成果,梳理分析了近年来此领域的三个研究热点:发展中国家知识产权保护测度研究、发展中国家知识产权保护对创新作用机制研究、知识产权创新激励效应的产业差异研究,并提出聚焦知识产权保护对发展中国家自主创新能力的影响研究,量身打造发展中国家知识产权保护测度研究,拓展发展中国家知识产权保护对企业创新的作用机制研究,深化知识产权创新激励效应的产业差异研究,加强面向创新主体的发展中国家知识产权保护政策研究等未来研究方向。In the past decades, widespread interest and disputes have centered around the effects of enhanced intellectual property rights(IPRs) protection on innovative capacity in developing countries. This paper begins with three theories addressing the relationship between IPRs protection and innovation in developing countries. The negative relationship theory concludes that tighter IPRs only strengthen the monopoly power of large corporations in developed countries, to the detriment of the growth of developing countries. The theory, based on endogenous growth models, assumes that innovation takes place in the North from which the South imitates. It reasons that tighter IPRs move the term of trade against the South, and that the consequent rate of innovation from the South, if responsive to this policy, would rise initially followed by decline that eventually overrides the initial rise. In Contrary, the positive relationship theory states that tighter IPRs encourage innovation from which all regions benefit. It presumes that the South can innovate based on its own technological needs and technology spillovers. As a result, lax IPRs protection reduces innovative efforts in developed countries, and subsequently hurts all countries participating in the global trade system. In this regard, tighter intellectual property rights protection would benefit the South. Lastly, the inverted–U relationship theory suggests that the relationship between intellectual property protection and innovation is inverted-U-shaped. Such relationship emerges from an interaction between learning-driven and R&D-driven technological advances, which assumes that innovation requires the input of knowledge(i.e. the accumulation of prior innovations), and that the protection of IPRs has two effects on innovation:(1) promoting innovation by inhibiting imitation and increasing profits available to innovators;(2) hampering innovation by making the process of knowledge accumulation more difficult. These two opposite effects result in a nonlinear relations
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46