检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴和成[1] 赵培皓 Wu Hecheng;Zhao Peihao(School of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China;School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China)
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京211106 [2]东南大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210096
出 处:《科技管理研究》2020年第7期96-103,共8页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“跨行政区域创新主体协同创新平台构建及运行机制研究”(16BGL033)。
摘 要:以江浙沪三地为研究对象,结合三地2008-2016年的面板数据,探讨制度临近性、认知邻近性和经济邻近性等因素对协同创新绩效的影响。实证结果表明,经济邻近性和制度邻近性能够促进协同创新绩效的提升;认知邻近性与协同创新绩效的关系呈倒U形。模型测度结果显示,江浙沪地区之间的认知邻近性较高,已对协同创新绩效产生抑制作用;经济邻近性和制度邻近性对跨区域协同创新绩效尚处于正向影响阶段。最后基于实证结果提出政策建议。This paper takes Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai as research objects, and combines the panel data of 2008-2016 in three places to explore the influence of institutional proximity, cognitive proximity and economic proximity on collaborative innovation performance. The empirical results show that economic proximity and institutional proximity can promote the improvement of collaborative innovation performance;the relationship between cognitive proximity and collaborative innovation performance is inverted U-shaped. The model measurement results show that the cognitive proximity among Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai regions is high, which has inhibited the synergistic innovation performance. Economic proximity and institutional proximity are still in a positive impact on cross-regional collaborative innovation performance. Finally, policy suggestions are put forward based on the empirical results.
分 类 号:F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3