盗窃比特币行为的定性分析  

Qualitative Study of the Criminal Responsibility of Stealing Bitcoins

作　　者：周铭川[1] ZHOU Ming-chuan(School of Law,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期103-109,共7页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“上海市智慧城市建设中新型网络犯罪治理研究”(2018BFX018)。

摘　　要：由于比特币投机具有严重的社会危害性,因而一直被我国有关部门严厉禁止,导致比特币事实上具有违禁品性质,不是我国刑法所保护的财物。但是,由于持有者对其比特币具有财产性利益,侵犯比特币持有会破坏社会秩序。为了维护社会秩序,对于盗窃他人比特币的行为,仍有必要运用刑法予以打击。就持有者的管理控制能力而言,比特币与无体物比较接近,而与虚拟物品差异较大,加上盗窃纸钱包、硬钱包时并不需要侵入他人计算机信息系统获取数据等原因,对盗窃比特币的行为以盗窃罪论处比以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪论处更加合理,并且只需要根据情节轻重定罪量刑而不需要计算盗窃数额。Because bitcoin speculation is severely harmful to the society,so it is banned in China,which results in the fact that the bitcoin is contraband and not legally-protected in China.However,the holder enjoys the property right,bitcoin stealing will do harm to social order.In order to maintain social order,it is still necessary to sterile the bitcoin-stealing crime according to the criminal law.As far as the holder’s management and control ability is concerned,the bitcoin is closer to the inanimating objects while it is radically different from the virtual item.In addition,it is not necessary to hack the victim’s computer information systems when stealing a paper wallet or hard wallet.It will be more reasonable to convict as the theft crime instead of the crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data,and only the seriousness of circumstances will be considered instead of the amount of money.

关 键 词：比特币 违禁品 盗窃罪 非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]