检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管海彦 Guan Hai-yan(Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou,Gansu,730070 China)
机构地区:[1]甘肃政法大学公安技术学院,甘肃兰州730070
出 处:《西部公安论坛》2020年第1期22-26,共5页Journal of Western Public Security
基 金:兰州市科技发展计划项目(项目编号:2015-3-80);甘肃政法学院科研资助重点项目(项目编号:GZF2011XZDLW29);甘肃政法学院科研资助项目(项目编号:050204)阶段性成果。
摘 要:随着社会主义民主法制建设的高速发展和科学技术的不断进步,鉴定结论对于查明案件事实真相、辅助裁判起着越来越重要的作用。作为高度统一的科学和法律司法鉴定,由于行业主管部门缺乏行业管理,其科学性难以保证,司法鉴定质量必然会下降。当事人对司法鉴定意见存有疑虑,发生了大量鉴定和反复鉴定,司法鉴定证据作为司法审判服务失去了价值。笔者通过调研和查阅相关法律法规及文献,分析出在司法鉴定制度中的主要缺陷,并就行业管理对司法鉴定制度的立法与完善提出相应的举措。With the rapid development of socialist democracy and legal system construction and the continuous advancement of science and technology,the identification conclusions play an increasingly important role in ascertaining the facts of the case and assisting the referee.As a highly unified scientific and legal forensic appraisal,due to the lack of industry management in the competent authorities of the industry,its scientific nature is difficult to guarantee,and the quality of judicial appraisal will inevitably decline.The parties have doubts about the judicial appraisal opinions,and a large number of large-scale appraisals and repeated appraisals have occurred.The judicial appraisal evidence has lost value as a judicial trial service.Through investigation and review of relevant laws,regulations and literature,the author analyzes the main defects in the judicial identification system,and proposes corresponding measures for the legislation and improvement of the judicial identification system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.150.165