检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:甘淼 刘畅[1] 赵丽[2] 崇巍[1] GAN Miao;LIU Chang;ZHAO Li;CHONG Wei(Department of Emergency,The First Hospital,China Medical University,Shenyang 110001,China;Department of Radiology,The First Hospital,China Medical University,Shenyang 110001,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属第一医院急诊科,沈阳110001 [2]中国医科大学附属第一医院放射科,沈阳110001
出 处:《中国医科大学学报》2020年第5期458-462,共5页Journal of China Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨使用CT对比剂患者发生急性不良反应的相关因素。方法收集2018年1月1日至2019年2月28日我院使用CT对比剂患者的临床资料,包括性别、年龄、使用CT对比剂种类等,根据发生急性不良反应类型及严重程度,分析CT对比剂发生急性不良反应的相关因素。结果对比剂急性不良反应总发生率为0.068%;单因素logistic回归分析表明,年龄较小的患者易发生不良反应,碘帕醇发生不良反应的概率最小,碘普罗胺发生不良反应的概率最高(OR=133.626,95%CI:17.082~1045.316)。多因素logistic回归分析表明,年龄小及使用碘普罗胺是发生急性不良反应的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。碘普罗胺急性不良反应发生率最高(1.375%),急性轻度不良反应发生率高于碘帕醇、碘海醇、碘克沙醇、碘佛醇(均P<0.05);急性中度不良反应、急性过敏样不良反应发生率亦高于碘帕醇、碘海醇、碘克沙醇、碘佛醇对比剂(均P<0.001)。各对比剂严重不良反应发生率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。急性过敏样不良反应患者年龄较小[51(44~56)岁]。结论年轻患者使用碘普罗胺时发生CT对比剂急性不良反应发生风险高。使用碘普罗胺易发生轻度、中度不良反应,也较易发生过敏样反应。发生急性过敏样不良反应常见于年轻患者。Objective To examine the factors related with acute adverse drug reactions(ADRs)in patients who undergo computed tomography(CT)with contrast agents.Methods Clinical information,including patient name,sex,and age,and type of CT contrast agent used in patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT in our hospital between January 1,2018,and February 28,2019,was collected.According to the type and severity of the acute ADRs,the effect of patient sex and age,and the type of contrast agent used on acute ADRs was compared.Results The total incidence of acute ADRs induced by CT contrast agents was 0.068%.Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that younger patients were more prone to adverse reactions.The probability of adverse reactions to iopalol was the lowest,and the probability of adverse reactions to iopromide was the highest(OR=133.626,95%CI:17.082-1045.316).A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that younger age and iopromide use were independent risk factors of acute ADRs(P<0.05).The incidence of acute ADRs to iopromide(1.375%)was the highest.The incidence of acute mild and moderate ADRs and acute allergic-like adverse reactions were higher for iopromide than for other contrast agents,namely iopanol,iohexol,iodixanol,and ioversol(P<0.05 or P<0.001).We found no significant difference in the incidence of severe ADRs among these contrast agents(P>0.05).Acute allergic ADRs often occurred in younger patients(51 years[range 44-56 years]).Conclusion Patients who underwent CT with iopromide and younger patients had higher risks of acute ADRs.Mild and moderate allergic reactions were more likely to occur with iopromide use,similar to allergic-like adverse reactions.Patients with acute allergic ADRs were younger.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.124.77