企业环境污染第三方治理侵权责任的划分——德国环境设备责任的启示  

The Division of Tort Liability for the Third-party Governance of Enterprise Environmental Pollution:Enlightenment from German Environmental Equipment Liability

作　　者：孔东菊 Kong Dongju

机构地区：[1]安徽工业大学公共管理与法学院,安徽马鞍山243000

出　　处：《南海法学》2019年第6期31-40,共10页The South China Sea Law Journal

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“企业环境污染第三方治理法律问题研究”(14YJA820012);安徽省教育厅重点项目“农业面源污染多元化治理法律问题研究”(SK2017A0090)。

摘　　要：企业环境污染第三方治理中,对于如何划分排污企业与治理第三方的环境侵权民事责任,学界存在较大分歧。通过对现有主要规范性文件梳理发现,从责任类型到具体内容,现有规范都不甚明确。德国环境法上的环境设备责任制度与"污染者负担"原则及排污企业的注意义务均无矛盾之处,具有一定的合理性。为此,可以借鉴德国环境设备责任制度中的合理因素,区分委托运营形式和建设运营形式,根据具体情形划分排污企业与治理第三方之间的侵权责任。In the third-party governance of enterprise environmental pollution,there are great divergences in academic circles on how to divide the environmental tort liability of pollution emission enterprises and the third-party governors.The existing norms are not clear from the type of responsibility to the specific content.There is no contradiction between the environmental equipment liability system in German environmental law,the principle of"polluter’s burden"and the care duty of pollution emission enterprises,which is reasonable to some extent.Therefore,we can draw lessons from the reasonable factors in German environmental equipment liability system,distinguish the entrusted operation form and the construction operation form,and divide the tort liability between the pollution emission enterprises and the third-party governors according to the specific situation.

关 键 词：企业环境污染 第三方治理 侵权责任 划分 德国环境设备责任 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] D913[政治法律—法学]