集体产权下农民的土地观念及形成机制——基于定县米村的个案考察  

The Peasant’s Conception of Land and Its Formation under Collective Property Rights—Based on the Case Study of Mi Village in Ding County

作　　者：黄家亮[1] 郑绍杰 Huang Jialiang;Zheng Shaojie(Sociology Department,Socio logical Theory and Method Research Center,Renmin University of China;Sociological Theory and Method Research Center,Renmin University of China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学社会学系暨社会学理论与方法研究中心 [2]中国人民大学社会学理论与方法研究中心

出　　处：《开放时代》2020年第3期79-89,M0005,共12页Open Times

基　　金：中国人民大学“统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设”专项经费项目“中国农村社会变迁与治理转型——河北定县农村百年演变的调查研究”(项目编号:15XNLG04)的支持。

摘　　要：当下农民的土地观念呈现出“语言混乱”的复杂形态,它是平均主义观念与“市场-产权”观念这两套不同话语体系在同一时空场景下相互碰撞与拉扯、发生抵牾和矛盾的结果。“语言混乱”的观念结构有其深刻的制度性根源,平均主义观念来自于集体化时期,并在改革开放后实现了延续与再生产,“市场-产权”观念则是农地制度市场化取向改革的必然结果。现有农地制度既维系着土地集体所有的底线框架,又构建了一系列以市场化为取向的制度举措,具有内在张力的底线框架与制度举措在时下交汇并存,形成了一定程度的制度错位,由此型塑了具有内在张力的土地观念结构。There is a remarkable“linguistic”confusion in the peasants’conception of land which represents two contrasting ideologies,namely,“egalitarianism”and“market and property rights”,colliding and conflicting each other in the peasants’mind.The ideological confusion has its profound institutional roots.Egalitarianism stemmed from the collectivization period and has been carried forward after the reform and opening up.The concept of“market and property rights”is the inevitable result of the market-oriented reform of the farmland system.The existing farmland system holds on to collective ownership as its bottom line,but at the same time has incorporated a series of market-oriented institutional measures.The time-honored bottom line and the newly introduced institutional measures are somewhat strange bedfellows,resulting in a certain degree of institutional dislocation and a conflicting conception of land ownership.

关 键 词：集体产权 土地观念 语言混乱 平均主义 “市场-产权”观念 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]