检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙杰[1] 王丽萍[1] 张萍 SUN Jie;WANG Li-ping;ZHANG Ping(No.4 Ward of Brain Department,Shiyan People's Hospital,Shenzhen 518108,China)
机构地区:[1]深圳市宝安区石岩人民医院脑科四区,广东深圳518108
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2020年第14期165-166,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨护理流程优化干预在急性缺血性脑卒中患者超早期静脉溶栓治疗中的应用效果。方法将42例急性缺血性脑卒中患者按照电脑随机选取方式分为对照组(21例,常规护理)与观察组(21例,护理流程优化干预)。比较两组的护理效果。结果干预后,两组的生存质量评分均升高,脑神经功能评分均降低,且观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的症状性颅内出血发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论护理流程优化干预应用于急性缺血性脑卒中患者超早期静脉溶栓治疗中,可改善神经功能损伤程度,提高患者的生存质量,安全性高。Objective To explore the application effect of nursing process optimization intervention on ultra-early intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Methods A total of 42 patients with acute ischemic stroke were divided into control group(21 cases,routine nursing)and observation group(21 cases,nursing process optimization intervention)by the computer random selection method.The nursing effects of the two groups were compared.Results After intervention,the quality of life score in the two groups increased,and the brain nerve function score decreased,and those in the observation group were better than the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Nursing process optimization intervention applied to ultra-early intravenous thrombolysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke can improve the degree of neurological function damage,enhance the quality of life of patients,and have high safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222