检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许琪[1] 贺光烨 胡洁[1] XU Qi;HE Guangye;HU Jie(School of Social and Behavioral Sciences,Nanjing University)
机构地区:[1]南京大学社会学院
出 处:《社会》2020年第3期88-116,共29页Chinese Journal of Sociology
基 金:南京大学双一流大学建设“卓越工程”之“社会学理论与中国研究”项目的成果之一。
摘 要:本文基于CGSS 2005和CGSS 2015研究中国民众社会公平感的变迁趋势,并从市场化的角度分析社会变迁与公平感变迁之间的关系。研究发现,2005-2015年,民众的结果公平感有所提升,但机会公平感有所下降。模型分析结果支持"参照群体论",但与"社会结构论"并不完全一致。在控制所有变量的影响以后,地区的市场化程度能够显著提升个体的结果公平感,并削弱机会公平感。Oaxaca-Blinder分解结果进一步显示,2005-2015年,中国社会市场化程度的提高是导致民众结果公平感上升和机会公平感下降的主要影响因素。随着市场化改革的不断深入,机会公平问题应当在日后的公平感研究中得到更多关注。Since the reform and opening-up in 1978,China has witnessed simultaneously a rapid economic growth as well as a sharp increase of incomeinequality as indicted in the Chinese Gini index,the most commonly used measurement of economic inequality.Consequently,Chinese people’s perception of distribution equity has aroused widespread academic interest at home and abroad.However,most existing studies on the subject only focus on the fairness of outcomes,and more or less ignore the issue of the fairness of opportunity.Moreover,most studies currently use cross-sectional survey data from a single year,so they only give one-time snap shots of people’s perception of distributive justice but cannot analyze anychange over time.This article uses the 2005 and 2015 China General Social Survey Data(CGSS)to study the tenyear changes in Chinese people’s sense of distributive justice and reveals that how marketization explains this changing pattern in China.The study found that from 2005 to 2015,the people’s sense of fairness on outcomes had improved,but the sense of opportunity fairness had declined.The results of the model analysis support the reference group theory,but they are not entirely consistent with the social structure theory.After controlling the influence of all other variables,the degree of marketization in the region seems to have significant impact the individual’s sense of fairness:the more marketization,the stronger perception of outcome fairness and the weaker perception of opportunity fairness.Furthermore,the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition shows that marketization alone can explain26.9%and 25.5%of variation for the decade change of people’s perceptions regarding outcome and opportunity inequality.Our study suggests that as marketization progresses,the opportunity inequality will be an important social issue worthy more attention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222