全球价值链地位的测度:方法评述及研究展望  

Measurement of Global Value Chain Status:Methodological Review and Research Prospects

作　　者：徐姗[1] 李容柔 Xu Shan;Li Rongrou(College of Economics,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou 310018,China)

机构地区：[1]杭州电子科技大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2020年第8期72-82,共11页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“新常态下中国服务外包产业突破‘价值链低端锁定’的路径优化及战略研究”(17CJY046);浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地(浙江省现代服务业研究中心)项目“承接国际服务外包与提升服务业创新能力的协同发展机制研究”(16JDGH098)。

摘　　要：系统地梳理全球价值链及其分工地位测度方法的相关成果,结合国内外研究现状,厘清文献的发展脉络和全球价值链理论框架,重点阐释并对比评述当前国外影响最广泛的全球价值链地位测度指标。研究发现:垂直专业化指数、出口产品价格指数、出口技术复杂度指数、全球价值链地位指数以及上游度指数是测度全球价值链地位使用频率最高、最具代表性的5种方法,各类指标的特征及适用领域存在差异性;此外,现有研究虽然提供了全球价值链地位的理论基础和实证经验,但仍存在前提假设脱离现实、数据更新时滞严重等局限,需要进一步完善。最后,从产业结构、测度指标、研究范围、数据库建设等方面展望未来的研究方向。This paper systematically sorts out the relevant results of the global value chain and its division of labor,combining the research status in China and abroad to clarify the development of the literature and theoretical framework of the global value chain,thoroughly interpreting and comparatively commenting on five most widely used foreign measure indicators of global value chain status index.The study finds that the vertical specialization index,export product price index,export technology complexity index,global value chain status index and upstream index are the five most frequently used and most representative methods for measuring the status of the global value chain,and there are differences in the characteristics and applicable fields of various indicators;in addition,although the existing research provides the theoretical basis and empirical experience of the status of the global value chain,there are still limitations such as the fact that the premises and assumptions deviate from reality and the time lag of data update is serious,which needs to be further improved.In the end,this paper puts forward the prospect of future research from the aspects of industrial structure,measurement indicators,research scope,database construction and so on.

关 键 词：全球价值链 全球价值链地位 测度指标 方法评述 研究展望 

分 类 号：F062.4[经济管理—政治经济学] G301[文化科学]