检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:关玲香[1] 朱霖[1] GUAN Lingxiang;ZHU Lin(School of PE,Leshan Normal University,Leshan Sichuan 614000,China)
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2020年第4期130-135,共6页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:运用逻辑分析方法,从社会学、刑法学、体育法学等多维视角探研竞技体育致害行为的正当化及其评定。研究结果表明:社会学理论在评定竞技体育致害行为的正当性上具有理论指导作用;刑法学理论能够用于剔除竞技体育致害行为中不正当的行为;体育法学理论在评定竞技体育致害行为的正当性上依然居于重要核心地位;竞技体育致害行为正当化的其他传统理论存在一定缺陷。竞技体育致害行为根据其与体育法规和法律法规的关系可以划分为正当行为、违规行为、违法行为和犯罪行为四种类型。评定竞技体育致害行为的正当性应构建从运动员技术动作的合理性、合法性、守规性三个维度去考量的思路。Using the method of logical analysis,from multidimensional perspectives of sociology,criminal law,sports law,etc.,this article explored and researched the justification and evaluation of harmful behavior in competitive sports. The results showed that the sociological theory had theoretical guidance in the evaluation of the legitimacy of the harmful behavior in the competitive sports;the theory of criminal law could be used to exclude criminal behavior in discerning the legitimacy of harmful behavior in competitive sports;the theory of sports law played an important role in the evaluation of the legitimacy of harmful behavior in competitive sports;the related traditional theories of competitive sports injury behavior had some defects;according to its relationship with sports laws as well as laws and regulations,the harmful behaviors could be divided into four types:proper behavior,irregularities behavior,illegal behavior and criminal behavior. At the same time it put forward the idea of considering the justification of harmful behaviors from three dimensions of rationality,legitimacy and compliance of the athletes’ technical actions.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177