论动物权利在法律上的可能性——一种康德式的辩护及其法哲学意涵  

The Possibility of Animal Rights in Law:A Kantian Defense and Its Implications in Legal Philosophy

作　　者：朱振[1] Zhu Zhen(School of Law,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,Jilin,China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期100-110,共11页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：吉林大学“新冠肺炎疫情防治相关问题研究”委托项目“新冠疫情下《野生动物保护法》的修法宗旨与完善建议研究”(2020XGZX27)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：学界普遍接受的是动物福利论,即我们对动物负有一种不完全的义务,它建立在仁慈、爱等美好的情感之上,因此,这种义务并不回应权利。为了融贯地解释现代民法关于动物地位的修正,就必须探寻一种法律意义上的动物权利论,重视权利在辩护动物保护中的重要性。对此,康德哲学既是一种固化的力量,也承担了解放的任务。人格人与物的二分法是现代民法的基础,辩护动物权利就要建构出一种独立的第三种规范性地位。人与动物在原初的意义上都享有一种生存于所处之境的权利。动物权利同样具有某种超越功利的性质,尽管这种权利还有很多的限度。对动物权利来说,最重要的功能是它的生产性,即能创造出新的义务。动物权利进入法律的关键在于我们自身观念的转变。What generally accepted by the academia is the animal welfare theory that we have an incomplete obligation to animals,and it is established on the good feelings of kindness,love and so on,so the obligation does not respond to the right.In order to explain the amendment of the civil law on the status of animals,it is necessary to explore an animal rights theory in the legal sense,and pay attention to the importance of the right to the protection of animals.In this regard,Kant’s philosophy is not only a solidified strength,but also bears the task of liberation.The dichotomy of persons and things is the basis of modern civil law,and defending the animal rights is to construct a kind of independent third normative status.Human beings and animals originally commonly have The Right to be Where You Are.Animal rights also have some kind of nature beyond utilitarialism,although this kind of right still has a lot of limits.For animal rights,the most important function of right is its production,and it can create new obligations.The key to entering the law of animal rights lies in changing our own ideas.

关 键 词：不完全义务 动物福利 动物权利 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]