检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高清震 GAO Qing-zhen(Zhuanghe Urban Water Affairs Service Center, Zhuanghe 116400, China)
机构地区:[1]庄河市水务事务服务中心,辽宁庄河116400
出 处:《黑龙江水利科技》2020年第4期68-72,共5页Heilongjiang Hydraulic Science and Technology
摘 要:文章以辽宁省庄河市英那河段为例,对河道水文面线利用MIKE11和HEC-RAS模型计算,通过对比实测水位数据计算了模型精度,综合考虑河道糙率、初始水位等水文参数,分析了模型的敏感性特征。研究表明:较HEC-RAS模型水面线计算,MIKE11模型的具有更高的精度和水位结果,引起水面线结果存在差异的关键原因为两个模型对河槽糙率的敏感性不同,其中对糙率更为敏感的为MIKE11模型;在推算英那河水面线时MIKE11模型具有更强的适用性和可行性。Taking the Yingna river section in Zhuanghe Cityo,Liaoning province,as an example,this paper uses MIKE11 and HEC-RAS models to calculate the hydrologic plane of the river course,calculates the model precision by comparing the measured water level data,and analyzes the sensitivity characteristics of the model by taking into account the hydrological parameters such as the initial water level of the river course roughness.The study shows that compared with HEC-RAS model,MIKE11 model has higher accuracy and higher water level results.The key reason for the difference in water level line results is that the two models have different sensitivity to channel roughness,among which,MIKE11 model is more sensitive to roughness.MIKE11 model has stronger applicability and feasibility in calculating the surface line of the Yingna river.
关 键 词:河道糙率 水面线 HEC-RAS MIKE 英那河
分 类 号:TV122[水利工程—水文学及水资源]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.80.203