检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李采薇 LI Caiwei(School of Laws,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《中国高新科技》2020年第6期24-27,共4页
摘 要:侵犯个人信息犯罪的法益取向一直是刑法理论界的热门话题,其中较有影响力的个人法益说、超个人法益说与双重法益说均有一定的合理性,但也存在不能克服的弊端。大数据时代的个人信息,不仅具有与个人密切相关的人身法益及财产性附属法益,还呈现出愈发强烈的社会化趋势。由各类法律法规所构建的个人信息管理制度作为一种超个人法益,同样值得刑法保护。The legal interests of the crime of violating personal information has always been a hot topic in the field of criminal law theory.Among the influential views,individual law interest theory,super-personal law interest and double law interests are all reasonable,but there are also shortcomings that cannot be overcome.In the era of big data,the personal information not only has the personal legal interest and property subsidiaty legal interest which is dosely related to the individual,but also shows a stonger trend of socialization.And the personal information management system constructed by various laws and regulations is also worthy of the protection of criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.161