《能源宪章条约》下特许权征收的认定标准研究  

Research on the Recognition Standard of Concession Expropriation under Energy Charter Treaty

作　　者：吕点点 Lv Diandian

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《法学杂志》2020年第5期131-140,共10页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：司法部2018年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目“国际投资仲裁案例的大数据分析:以适用《能源宪章条约》的投资仲裁案件为视角”(项目批准号:18SFB2053)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：国际能源投资中的征收风险是最大的风险之一,特许权在能源投资中所处地位异常重要。对比其他条约下能源特许权征收实践可以发现,《能源宪章条约》征收规则在合法性的判断上与其他条约大体相同,都采用了公共利益目的、非歧视性措施、正当法律程序、补偿措施作为认定标准。但《能源宪章条约》对直接征收与间接征收的区分是模糊的,对特许权撤销行为的认定标准是缺失的。我国作为《能源宪章条约》的观察国,应该签署加入条约并参与修订,以便更好地保护我国国际能源双向投资中的权益。Expropriation risk is one of the biggest risks in international energy investment,and concession is vital in energy investment.Comparing with energy concession expropriation practices under other treaties,Energy Charter Treaty expropriation rules are similarly adopted public interest,non-discriminatory measures,Due process,and compensatory measures as the criteria for determining legitimacy,but there is a lack of provisions determining direct and indirect expropriation,and the criteria for determining the nature of revocation of the concession is missing.As a signatory observer to the Energy Charter Treaty,China should formally sign up to be a member,join the subsequent amendments,thus provide better protection of our country’s rights and interests in international energy two-way investment.

关 键 词：《能源宪章条约》 特许权 征收 能源投资 

分 类 号：D996.9[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]