沉沦与上升:1990年代经济转轨时期的中国历史学  

Sink and rise:Chinese history during economic transition in 1990s

作　　者：陈峰[1] Chen Feng

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《东岳论丛》2020年第5期145-151,192,共8页DongYue Tribune

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“多卷本《20世纪中国史学通史》”;山东大学“改革开放40周年暨新中国成立70周年”专项课题“改革开放以来中国史学发展趋势研究”(HSS1801)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1990年代的市场经济体制转轨对当代中国历史学构成了强烈冲击。一些学者为了实现自救,主张让史学走向市场,根据市场和社会需求调整研究重心和研究课题,大力开拓应用研究,撰作适应市场的通俗史学、大众史学。另一部分学者则拒绝将史学作为商品,反对史学走向市场,强调发挥史学的文化功能,维护史学的学术属性,仍将历史学的生存发展寄望于国家和政府的保护和支持。一方面,1990年代历史学的市场化、商品化,导致了史学的功利化、庸俗化倾向。另一方面,市场体制取代计划体制,为历史学提供了一个多元立体的广阔活动空间。当代中国历史学终于告别政治化、意识形态化的笼罩,步入学术化轨道,走向独立和成熟。The transition to market economy in 1990s exerted a strong influence on Chinese history of the day.In order to save themselves,some scholars proposed to set history on a path towards the market and adjusted their research focuses and subjects according to demands of the market and society,so they industriously developed applica-tion studies and wrote popular and public histories.Some other scholars refused to commercialize history or ori-ent it to the market,emphasized the cultural function and the academic nature of history,and pinned their hope on protection and support of the nation and the govermment for development of history.On one hand,the mar-ketization and commercialization of history in 1990s resulted in its tendency to utiltarianism and vulgarization.On the other hand,the substitution of market system for planning system created a multi-dimensional and ex-pansive space for development of history.Contemporary Chinese history has finally freed from politicization and ideologization and turmed into the academic course towards independence and maturity.

关 键 词：市场经济 当代中国史学 1990年代 商品化 学术化 

分 类 号：K275[历史地理—历史学]