剖析南京审判与沈阳审判的不同点  

Analysis of the Differences Between Nanjing Trial and Shenyang Trial

作　　者：张海艳[1] Zhang Haiyan

机构地区：[1]沈阳“九·一八”历史博物馆

出　　处：《兰台世界》2020年第4期115-118,共4页Lantai World

摘　　要：二战后,中国人民在自己的土地上,对犯下滔天罪行的日本战犯进行了公开审判。历次审判中,以南京审判和沈阳审判最著名、影响最大。两次审判分别是在国民党和共产党的主导下进行,致使在两次审判中,日本战犯认罪态度,采取“宽大处理”方针的目的以及对中日关系影响方面的诸多不同点。从现象看本质,说明了中国共产党完全是代表中华民族根本利益,推护中国人民基本权益,能够带领中华民族走向独立、光明的政党。After World War Ⅱ, the Chinese people, on their own land, held a public trial of Japanese war criminals who committed heinous crimes. In all previous trials, Nanjing trial and Shenyang trial were the most famous and influential. The two trials were conducted under the leadership of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party respectively, which resulted in many differences in the attitudes of Japanese war criminals towards pleading guilty, the purpose of adopting the policy of "lenient treatment" and the impact on Sino-Japanese relations. From the phenomenon, it shows that the Communist Party of China represents the fundamental interests of Chinese nation, promotes and protects the fundamental rights and interests of Chinese people, and is able to lead the Chinese nation to an independent and bright future.

关 键 词：南京审判 沈阳审判 国民政府 新中国政府 

分 类 号：K266[历史地理—历史学]