罗马帝国时期埃及地方审判管辖浅析  

Analysis of the Local Trial Jurisdiction of Egypt in Roman Empire Age

作　　者：田明[1] 曲灵建 TIAN Ming;QU Ling-jian(College of Political&Law and History,Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities,Tongliao 028000,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古民族大学政法与历史学院,内蒙古通辽028000

出　　处：《内蒙古民族大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期48-54,共7页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“罗马—拜占廷时期的埃及历史研究”(项目编号:14BSS009);国家社科基金重大项目“拜占廷历史与文化研究”(项目编号:14ZDB061);“内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才”支持计划项目(项目编号:NJYT-17-A02)。

摘　　要：罗马征服给埃及司法工作带来新的变化。罗马统治者根据其统治需要,在古罗马已有法律实践的基础上吸收、借鉴以往埃及法律惯例,造就了罗马埃及独特的司法制度。在不断地交流互鉴过程中,罗马埃及地方的审判管辖逐渐形成四级审级制度,各审级间的审判管辖权限层次分明,并且审判管辖亦形成了新的特征,即罗马埃及地方审级设置过多、军人参与司法事务和总督拥有最高司法权等特点。埃及地方审判管辖的发展无疑体现其渐趋罗马化的特征。The Roman conquest brought new changes to Egyptian judicial work. According to their ruling needs, Roman rulers absorbed and borrowed from the previous Egyptian legal practices on the basis of the existing legal practice, which promoted the unique judicial system of Rome and Egypt. In the process of continuous exchange and mutual authentication, the trial jurisdiction of Rome and Egypt had gradually formed a four-level trial system. The trial jurisdiction of each trial system was clearly defined,and the trial jurisdiction had also formed a new feature, that is to say, namely, the excessive setting of local trials in Rome and Egypt,the participation of military personnel in judicial affairs and the highest judicial power of the Governor. It can be seen that the development of the local trial jurisdiction of Egypt reflects its gradual process of Romanization.

关 键 词：埃及 法律 罗马帝国 审判管辖 

分 类 号：K411[历史地理—历史学]