行政吸纳社会:基层治理困境分析--以H市农村调查为例  

Administrative absorption of society and dilemma of grassroots governance: A case study of rural survey in H City

作　　者：刘锐[1] LIU Rui(School of Public Management,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学公共管理学院,四川成都610065

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期135-143,共9页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“乡村振兴背景下农村‘三治’协同机制研究”(18CZZ037);成都市城乡治理现代化研究基地项目“转型与创生:新型城镇化背景下成都‘村改居’社区治理研究”(CD19JD1);四川大学创新火花项目“库项目‘三治’结合背景下农村微腐败整体性治理研究”(2018hhf-10)。

摘　　要：以H市D镇的田野调查资料为基础,探讨长三角农村社会稳定有序的原因,分析行政吸纳模式的工具价值及内在缺陷。研究表明,在利益密集涌现的背景下,政府通过垄断乡村治理资源,建立垂直行政机构及权力依附结构,过密化输入资源以满足总体诉求,建立起行政吸纳社会的体制。村级组织和村庄社会被吸纳,不但会带来村庄权力结构稳定,而且获得了广泛的社会满意。但其意外后果是,行政权力沦为纯粹的供给服务的管理技术,单向的福利分配潜藏着政治整合危机。只有以资源输入为载体激活村庄政治,制度建设才会降低运行成本,基层善治才会实现表里如一。Based on the field investigation data of D Town in H City, this paper discusses the reasons for the stability and order of the rural society in the Yangtze River Delta, and analyzes the instrumental value and internal defects of the administrative absorption model. Research shows that under the background of intensive emergence of interests, the government has established a system of absorbing society by monopolizing rural governance resources, establishing vertical administrative institutions and power attachment structures, and over-densifying input resources to meet the overall demands. Village organizations and village society are absorbed, which not only brings the stability of village power structure, but also obtains the widespread social satisfaction. But its unexpected consequence is that administrative power has been reduced to a management technology that provides pure services, and a one-way welfare distribution has hidden political integration crisis. Only when the village politics is activated by the input of resources, will the construction of the system reduce the operating cost, thus achieving good governance at the grassroots level.

关 键 词：基层治理 资源下乡 行政吸纳 村庄政治 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]