我国城市天然气供应中常用调峰方式的比较分析  

Comparative Analysis of Common Peak Shaving Methods in China’s Urban Natural Gas Supply in China

作　　者：邱禹桐 Qiu Yutong(North China Branch of China Huadian Clean Energy Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300202,China)

机构地区：[1]中国华电集团清洁能源有限公司华北分公司,天津300202

出　　处：《中国资源综合利用》2020年第5期52-54,共3页China Resources Comprehensive Utilization

摘　　要：在我国城市天然气供应中,常用调峰方式有四种,即地下储气库、LNG、地面高压储气球罐、高压管道储气。本文首先从技术角度对这四种调峰方式进行对比,然后从建设投资、调峰成本以及运营成本等方面来比较它们的经济性。研究结果表明,地下储气库调峰方式最经济,但该方式在使用过程中受到地质等相关条件的限制,而高压管道储气调峰方式更适用于我国天然气供应。In China’s urban natural gas supply,there are four common peak-shaving methods,namely underground gas storage,LNG,ground high-pressure storage balloon tank,and high-pressure pipeline gas storage.This paper first compared these four peak shaving methods from a technical perspective,and then compared their economics in terms of construction investment,peak shaving costs,and operating costs.The research results show that the peak shaving method of underground gas storage is the most economical,but this method is restricted by geological and other related conditions during use,and the peak shaving method of high-pressure pipeline gas storage is more suitable for natural gas supply in China.

关 键 词：城市天然气供应 常用调峰方式 经济层面 技术层面 

分 类 号：F426.22[经济管理—产业经济] TU996[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]