检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田杨[1] TIAN Yang(Institute of Demography,Shandong Academy of Social Sciences,Ji'nan 250002,Shandong Province,China)
机构地区:[1]山东社会科学院人口学研究所,山东济南250002
出 处:《老龄科学研究》2019年第9期68-79,共12页Scientific Research on Aging
基 金:国家社科青年项目“农村留守老人家庭赡养的社会支持机制研究”(项目号16CRK010)。
摘 要:我国社会养老服务体系构建仍偏重供给侧建设,失能失智老年人照护服务现状与需求满足之间存在很大差距。长期照护保险制度在我国仍在探索阶段,而作为长期照护"重中之重"的失智症患者的照护政策还未正式起步。鉴于部分发达国家已把应对失智症风险纳入国家长期战略规划,立足国际视野,关注失智老年人照护对策问题,梳理日韩两国失智老年人照护保障政策的发展历程和经验,并通过对两国失智症政策的纵向和横向比较,把握国际社会失智症患者照护服务政策的发展趋势,从政策战略目标、政策制定和执行主体、政策内容以及政策对象四个方面,提出借鉴日韩政府应对失智症风险的实践经验,加强对失智症群体的关注和保障力度。The senior care services system in China still focuses on the supply side,and there is a large gap between the current state of care services for elders with mental incapacity and their demands.The long-term care(LTC)insurance system is still being explored in China,and care policies for elders with mental incapacity(focus of LTC)are yet to be developed.In view of the fact that some developed countries have incorporated the response to the risk of dementia into their national long-term strategic plans,this article,with an international perspective,paid great attentions to this issue and combed the development history and experience of care policies for elders with mental incapacity in Japan and South Korea.Then,through vertical and horizontal comparisons of dementia-responding policies in the two countries,and by grasping the development trend of care policies for elders with mental incapacity across the world,we proposed from four aspects(strategic goals of policies,policy formulation and implementation bodies,content of policies and policy objects)that China should draw experience from the two governments and give more priority and protection to those vulnerable elders.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15