“两可之说”是中国版的“囚徒困境”  

Ancient Chinese Philosopher’s Fuzziness Assumption as a Chinese version of“Prisoner’s Dilemma”

作　　者：刘明明 LIU Mingming

机构地区：[1]天津财经大学经济学系,天津300222

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第6期180-188,共9页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目《八卷〈中国逻辑史〉》[项目编号:14ZDB013]子课题“中国逻辑的深化发展”。

摘　　要：对于邓析的“两可之说”——名辩逻辑的一个经典案例,人们历来从它是否为诡辩去分析,其实,它是一个博弈案例,当属非零和博弈。从中国传统的义利观来看,它应是中国版的“囚徒困境”。从博弈逻辑视角来看,“两可之说”可归入“博弈逻辑”范畴。Deng Xi is an ancient Chinese philosopher in the Spring and Autumn Period,famous for his fuzziness assumption in logic.Some researchers consider it a tricky argument.In fact it involves non-zero gaming.From the standpoints of traditional Chinese concept of righteousness and benefit it is a Chinese version of“prisoner’s dilemma”.Academically,it belongs to the logic category of gaming.

关 键 词：“两可之说” 囚徒困境 博弈逻辑 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]