奥运会临时仲裁中程序性权利保障机制的优化  

Optimization of Procedural Rights Protection Mechanism in Temporary Arbitration of Olympic Games

作　　者：朱霖[1] 胡军[1] ZHU Lin;HU Jun(School of P.E,Leshan Normal University,Leshan Sichuan 614000,China)

机构地区：[1]乐山师范学院体育学院,乐山四川614000

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2020年第5期106-113,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：以奥运会临时仲裁中程序性权利保障不足为逻辑起点,从法理视角分析程序性权利研究范围,探讨程序性权利保障不足之缘由,并提出相应优化措施。研究认为:申请权行使受限;质证权行使不确定;知情权保障不足;申诉权制度缺失。建议:通过理念、路径、制度三个维度系统优化程序性权利保障机制。理念上要体现公平、效率、规范的价值品性;路径上要保证体育组织、仲裁机构、司法机关三位一体的救济格局;制度上须展现出科学、理性、精炼的规制特色。This paper takes the lack of protecting procedural rights in temporary Olympic arbitration as the logic starting point,analyzes the research scope on procedural rights from the perspective of legal theory,explores the reasons for the lack of protecting procedural rights,and puts forward the corresponding optimization measures.The results of the study show that the exercise of the right to apply is limited;the exercise of cross-examination rights is uncertain;the protection of the right to know is insufficient;and the right to appeal system is missing.Suggestions are as follows:The procedural rights protection mechanism is optimized systematically by the three dimensions of idea,path,and system.First,the idea must embody the value of fairness,efficiency,and norm;secondly,the path should ensure the trinity relief pattern of sports organization,arbitration institution,and judicial institution;and finally,the system must display the regulatory features of science,rationality,and refinement.

关 键 词：奥运会 临时仲裁 特设分院 程序性权利 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]