《资本论》文本解释的三重循环  

The Triple Cycle of Text Explanation in Capital

作　　者：王海龙 WANG Hailong(School of Marxism,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710049)

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学马克思主义学院,陕西西安710049

出　　处：《长白学刊》2020年第3期54-60,共7页Changbai Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“解释学视角下的《资本论》经济哲学研究”(14XKS005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“《资本论》中的经济伦理思想研究——以解释学为视角”(17LZUJBWCX014)。

摘　　要：《资本论》是马克思最为成熟的代表作之一,“解释学循环”是解释学最为重要的核心理论概念,可以为《资本论》研究提供新的视角。以《资本论》文本为中心的循环,力求回归于文本的原初本意,却无法彰显文本的历史意义;以《资本论》理解者为中心的循环,以期进入文本的历史语境,却容易产生个人相对性的理解;以《资本论》理解为中心的循环,达到根本性的否定理解结果的绝对权威,却可能陷入主观唯心主义。只有在坚持实践本体论的基础上,辨析三重循环的关系,驾驭三重循环的功能,实现三重循环层层递进、并行不悖,才能认知解释学的理论边界,进行解释学的马克思主义重建,促进后人对《资本论》循序渐进的理解,从而获取一种解决“回到马克思”与“在场的马克思”之间分歧的可能性路径。Capital is one of the Marx's most mature representative works."Hermeneutic cycle"is the most important core theoretical concept of hermeneutics,which can provide a new perspective for the study of Capital.The cycle centered on the text ofCapital strives to return to the original intention of the text,but it cannot show the historical significance of it;the cycle centered on the reader of Capital hopes to enter the historical context of the text,but it is easily lead to personally relative understanding;the cycle centered on the understanding of Capital attains a fundamentally absolute authority to deny the result of understanding,but it may fall into subjective idealism.Only on the basis of adhering to the practical ontology,distinguishing the relationship of the triple cycle,harnessing the function of the triple cycle,and realizing the layers of progressive and parallelism of the triple cycle,can we understand the theoretical boundary of hermeneutics and reconstruct of Marxism of hermeneutics,facilitating the step-by-step understanding of Capital for later generations,so as to obtain a possible path to resolve the differences between"back to Marx"and"Marx present".

关 键 词：《资本论》 解释学循环 理解 政治经济学 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]