检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟吉良[1] 杨波[1] 刘森[1] 余可谊[1] 林进[1] 王炜[1] 赵峻[2] ZHAI Ji-liang;YANG Bo;LIU Sen;YU Ke-yi;LIN Jin;WANG Wei;ZHAO Jun(Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,CAMS&PUMC,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Educational Administration,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,CAMS&PUMC,Beijing 100730,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院骨科,北京100730 [2]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院.教育处,北京100730
出 处:《基础医学与临床》2020年第6期847-850,共4页Basic and Clinical Medicine
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2018YFF0301105);北京协和医学院研究生教改项目(PUMC-GS-2015005);北京协和医学院本科生教改项目(2015zlgc0122)。
摘 要:目的比较传统教学方法与基于标准操作规范(SOP)的骨科教学查房方法的教学质量差异。方法随机选取2017级和2018级参与骨科住院医师规范化培训的轮转研究生及临床博士后,每个年级研究生及临床博士后分别为30人和20人;分别采用传统或基于SOP的教学查房方法;教学查房结束后对两组进行主观及客观评价。结果基于SOP的教学查房方法主观及客观评价得分均显著高于传统教学组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论基于SOP的教学查房方法可显著提高教学查房质量。Objective To compare the teaching quality between traditional and SOP(standard operation procedure)-based orthopedic teaching rounds.Methods Postgraduates and clinical postdoctors who were enrolled into orthopedic standardized training in 2017 and 2018 grade were included in this study.Thirty postgraduates and 20 clinical post doctors were in each group,with traditional or SOP-based teaching rounds were used respectively.The two groups were evaluated subjectively and objectively.Results The subjective and objective evaluation scores of SOP-based teaching rounds were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching group(P<0.01,P<0.05).Conclusions SOP-based method significantly improves the quality of teaching rounds.
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222