战后发展经济学的三次范式转换——兼论构建迈向高质量发展的发展经济学  

Three Paradigm Shifts of Post-war Development Economics: Towards a Stage of High-Quality Development

作　　者：黄阳华 Huang Yanghua

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院办公厅

出　　处：《政治经济学评论》2020年第2期109-136,共28页China Review of Political Economy

基　　金：国家自科基金青年项目“双重约束下地方政府土地出让行为对中国双重转型的影响研究”(批准号71503261);清华大学中国现代国有企业研究院的资助。

摘　　要：本文系统梳理战后发展经济学的三次范式转换,比较"市场失灵-政府干预"的结构范式、"政府失灵-市场机制"新古典范式和"创新失灵-国家体系"演化范式在理论与政策方面的继承与分野,分析了各种范式对我国不同发展时期的影响。我国已经进入了中上等收入阶段,加快构建创新型国家,把握新一轮技术革命和产业变革的战略机遇,是我国迈向高质量发展的重大任务。以创新为内核的演化发展经济学,将对我国高质量发展提供重要启示。This paper surveys the three paradigm shifts in development economics since the Second World War,compares the similarities and the divergences among the structuralist paradigm of"market failure-state intervention",the neo-classical paradigm of"state failure-market mechanism"and the evolutionary paradigm of"innovation failure-national system",presents the comparison in the theory and policy among different paradigms,and also examines the influence of each paradigm on China’s long-run development stage by stage.China is an upper-middle income economy.To build-up national innovation system and to seize the opportunity of new industrial revolution is the major task of high-quality development.The innovation-based evolutionary paradigm will provide China’s high-quality development with important implications.

关 键 词：发展经济学 结构范式 新古典范式 演化范式 高质量发展 

分 类 号：F061.3[经济管理—政治经济学] F124